What Threads Actually Look Like Inside Your Face

By Dr. Cameron Chesnut, MD | 5 Codes Podcast OR Diaries
Most people who have had threads done barely remember them. The results were subtle at best, the threads were supposed to dissolve, and life moved on. By the time they come in for a real lifting procedure, threads are the last thing on their mind.
They are not the last thing on mine.
This week I finished my last day of surgery with a case that illustrated something I think about every time I open the face of a patient with a prior thread history.
What threads look like from the outside (temporary, dissolving, low-commitment) is not what they look like from the inside. And the gap between those two pictures is something that does not get talked about nearly enough.
What Do Thread Lifts Look Like During Surgery?
She had worked in the aesthetics industry. She was informed, self-aware, and honest about her history. She had a small variety of procedures done over the years, nothing dramatic. She knew going in that she had some matting and fibrosis in her skin from prior radiofrequency microneedling, a flat, firm, fibrous quality to the tissue and fat pads beneath it. We had planned for that.
What she was vague on was her thread history. She had had them done at some point, could not remember exactly when or where, and said they had never given her any noticeable result. She had essentially forgotten about them.
When I got into her soft tissue during the lifting procedure, I found them.
A few different things were visible, which suggested to me she had likely had threads placed at different times. Some threads were still intact. Threads that theoretically should have dissolved long ago.
And in other areas, I could see fibrotic tissue where threads had been: dense, scarred regions left behind as the threads were resorbed by the body.
This is what the collagen-building sales pitch actually looks like in practice. Not a smooth structural improvement. Scarring. Collagen as a consequence of a foreign body response, not a therapeutic outcome.
I removed what I could. That takes extra time, extra care, and extra surgical effort. But I want them out, and there is a specific reason for that.
Can Thread Lifts Affect Future Facelift Surgery?
Over the years I have operated on patients with thread histories, and I have seen a consistent pattern that I think other surgeons are observing without always recognizing what they are looking at.
Threads are linear by definition. And there are very few things in the human body that are perfectly straight. So when you open the face and see a straight line of inflammation, a straight band of fibrosis, a linear track of altered tissue, there is no ambiguity about what caused it. It is impossible to miss once you have seen it.
What drives it can vary. Sometimes it is a biofilm, which is a bacterial adhesion that forms on the thread material and essentially becomes a low-grade chronic infection that gets stirred up when surgery introduces new healing activity in the area. Sometimes it is simply the immune system recognizing a walled-off foreign body and responding to it again when the tissue environment changes.
In more significant cases, I have seen patients develop firm, binding fibrosis in the area of prior threads following a subsequent lift, that is, a scarring and matting reaction that complicates the result and requires active management.
None of this is inevitable. But the idea that placing a foreign body in the face carries zero long-term consequence is naive at best. At worst, it reflects surgeons not examining their outcomes closely enough to notice what is there.
Why Do Some Surgeons Avoid Thread Lifts?
Threads are, at their core, a crutch for someone who needs a lift and is not ready to commit to one. That is not a judgment. It is just an honest description of what they are being used for and what they are actually capable of delivering.
No device lifts. This is true of energy-based (laser) devices and it is equally true of threads. Threads do not reposition descended facial structures. They do not release retaining ligaments. They do not address the deeper layers where meaningful structural change happens. At their absolute best, they provide a temporary, modest surface change that most patients describe as underwhelming... and then dissolve, with traces of whatever biologic signature they leave behind.
The risks people are warned about up front are real: expense, nerve proximity, the immediate procedural risks. But the downstream risks are the ones that rarely get discussed in the consultation room.
What happens when you eventually do the procedure you actually needed?
What does the surgeon find when they open that tissue? How does prior thread placement affect your healing, your inflammatory response, your result?
I have seen the answers to those questions play out in my operating room more times than I can count. They range from subtle to significant. None of them are zero.
What This Means if You Have Had Threads
Having a thread history is not a disqualifier for surgery. I operate on patients with prior threads regularly, and the outcomes are excellent. But it requires a surgeon who goes in with their eyes open, and one who is actively looking for what is there, prepared to remove it, and equipped with a recovery protocol that accounts for the inflammatory variability that prior threads can introduce.
My pre-surgery and recovery protocols are specifically designed to manage aberrant inflammation and support the tissue environment around the procedure. That matters in every surgical case. It matters more when there is a history of foreign bodies in the face.
The deeper point is one that connects to something I think about across all of these non-surgical interventions: every procedure carries consequences, including the ones marketed as consequence-free. Understanding what devices can and cannot do, and what they leave behind when you eventually move toward surgery, is part of making a genuinely informed decision about your face.
In addition, understanding the layers of the face that actually need to be addressed for a meaningful, lasting result is what separates a good outcome from one that requires revision.
When things in your face fall, they should be lifted. Not propped temporarily with something that dissolves and leaves a scar. That philosophy applies to threads as clearly as anything else I do.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do threads actually lift the face?
No. Threads can create a temporary surface change in some patients, but they do not reposition descended facial structures, release retaining ligaments, or address the deeper layers where structural aging actually occurs. The patients I see who have had threads most commonly describe the results as underwhelming or unnoticeable.
Are threads safe?
The immediate procedural risks are real: expense, proximity to nerves, and the standard risks of any procedure. The longer-term risks are less commonly discussed: fibrosis at the thread site, biofilm formation, and the potential for threads to complicate subsequent surgery are all things I see regularly in revision and primary cases on patients with thread histories.
Can I still have a facelift if I have had threads?
Yes. A thread history does not prevent you from having surgery. It does require a surgeon who is prepared to find and manage what is there, removing intact or fibrotic threads during the procedure and supporting your recovery in a way that accounts for the potential inflammatory variability that prior threads introduce.
What does thread fibrosis look like during surgery?
Threads are linear, and the tissue reactions they cause are linear. Straight bands of fibrosis, linear inflammation tracks, and firm scarred regions are visible intraoperatively and are essentially unmistakable once you know what you are looking at. The patterns are consistent enough that they are hard to miss — though I do think some surgeons observe them without fully recognizing what caused them.
How should I prepare for surgery if I have a thread history?
Be as specific as possible with your surgeon about when threads were placed, what type they were, and how many. Even if you do not remember the details, disclosing the history allows your surgeon to plan accordingly — both for what they may encounter intraoperatively and for how your recovery protocol should be structured.
To learn more about Dr. Chesnut's approach to surgical planning and recovery, visit Post-Surgical Recovery at Clinic 5C or start your journey here.
🎧 Listen to the full OR Diaries episode on Spotify | Apple Podcasts | YouTube
Ready to begin your wellness journey?
Fax: (844) 961-3417



.avif)